9 Comments

Nice overview!

Expand full comment

Let's keep it real about what the press says we know about Mr. Jack Teixeira.

-He grew up in a military family. Father retired. Mother worked for military related organizations. He would have been well aware that this was unacceptable.

-There is nothing sensational about him being on invitation only websites.

-Lots of military members like video games and many of those video games have violent sounding names. They also watch scary movies. None of this is different from what American civilian young men do at this age.

- I hate to break it to the prudes in the media, but military members (especially at that age) do engage in humor that could be labeled by a prude as crude. It's not just the men. Women engage in just as many jokes. Yes, I know this from personal experience as a female veteran who hung out with males and females.

-His friends online may have been other military members or other military brats. If so, all of these people should have turned him in. Why didn't they? Obviously there is no guarantee his online community were other military members or the kids of military members---but these are the people who would have been his direct peer group. It's a point the media misses everytime. During the Japan earthquake Fukujima most of the press forgot about the American military members stationed there. So I doubt they have the temerity to ask if his friends were military or related to the military and if so why they did not report him. They would also need to be arrested and detained. Yep, it works that way in the military. I can't speak for Congress where apparently anything goes in regards to Top Secret info.

-Young military members talking about guns is not an issue. Stick around and you will hear them talk about how to make beds, do push ups and how to iron uniforms. By the way, if military members are not allowed to talk about guns without being assumed violent, then the rest of you better understand that goes double for anyone who isn't military---including the cops who arrested him.

-Most people with his background would feel guilt about sharing classified material and try to hide. We are supposed to believe he threw a fit because no listened to him according to unnamed reports.

-After being told how he must be a gun toting mass murderer in the making, they tell us that he is a Christian and anti-war. SO WHICH IS IT? Obviously, people haven't read the Bible either.

-Military members often live with each other in shared dorm rooms or they will split the rent on a small house. We have yet to learn if any of his friends had his key, and if any of them had his log-ons. We have yet to hear if it was possible he was hacked.

-In the unlikely event he worked alone it's ok. He can always use the James Comey/ Hillary Clinton defense. If Commanders in Chief of the US military and Wanna-be Commanders in Chief of the US military set a bad example then this will come back to haunt us. Every American needs to ask for Hillary to be arrested just like this young man was. Anything else is partisan politics.

Expand full comment

if we dont know about it... did it ever happen? like the dairy cow splosion just one of 5 or so per day of food production disasters... or the 3 or so per day train mishaps. is my dreamworld changing to daymare. last plane out goes where? when?

Expand full comment

Okay, why? I can understand Truth Social but the rest?

Expand full comment
author

Did you read the article?

Expand full comment

Yes, how he got the info. is still sketchy.

Expand full comment

On further thinking, yes it was a psyop. However, it may have been to distract us from all the train derailments and figure they are just normal. THEY AREN'T! Another of the regime's war against us. I wish the train companies would shut down for a while. STARVE THE BEAST. We'll survive.

Does anyone know who in the administration did not sign their oath of office? I do and not signing is a felony. Hear that Kamala?

Expand full comment

It seems the entire regime hasn't signed :

Many Politicians and government appointees jobs at risk for not signing Oath of Office to protect the Constitution:

On Friday, a bunch of politicians and appointees had been NOTIFIED that their documentation and certification for taking the Oath of Office … (which is REQUIRED … for all office holders, whether they are elected or appointed)…. Was NOT on filed.

They had been FOIA-ed and could not produce those documents.

There might be a ceremonial taking of the Oath when a person takes office, but it MUST be followed up with a signed and notarized written Oath that is FILED correctly.

The penalty for violating the Oath of Office is perjury.

FACT: Signing these documents is MANDATORY.

FACT: They must certify their oath BEFORE they begin the duties of their office.

And the signed document must be Witnessed…. By the Notary who puts their seal on it… and filed correctly

People like the head of the CDC, and Secretary of the Army, etc. need that signed Oath.

The breaking news also said that Vice President Kamala Harris did not certify and file her Oath of Office.

She was put on NOTICE in the last 48 hours…. That she has 10 days to get that done, she is out of office.

I have been going over this with other people in the legal arena.

The reality is… anything these uncertified people have done up until that documentation is filed correctly…is NOT LEGAL.

Mon. 17 April Ann Vandersteel: Do we have Public servants in office right now acting as ‘elected officials’ without swearing allegiance to the Constitution? Immediately terminate positions for those who cannot produce an affidavit swearing allegiance to the Constitution: https://twitter.com/annvandersteel/status/1646654916532789248

For those individuals who have failed or refused to produce an affidavit as required by 5 U.S. Code, Section 3332, demand that those persons provide the U.S. Attorney and this Court with the compulsory affidavit within ten (10) days. For those individuals who do not produce the 5 U.S. Code, Section 3332 affidavit within ten (10) days as described above; as well as, those who have admitted they do not possess the requested affidavit and those who have produced defective affidavits:

a. Immediately terminate their appointments or positions;

b. Render all official acts, bills, laws, regulations, or any official actions whatsoever, including the appointment of any subordinates void ab initio and;

c. Replace and restore all proper, former office holders until competent replacements can be lawfully appointed.

A Writ of Quo Warranto [Document shown – Case Number 2023] to the U.S. Attorney in the District of Columbia…Petitioner-In Re: LISA MCGEE…stating that ‘Numerous Oaths of Office CANNOT be found on file for many of our federal officials including:

1. U.S. Vice President, Kamala Harris

2. Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin III

3. Director of Center of Disease Control and of Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Rocheli Walensky

4. U.S. Secretary of Treasury, Janet Yellen

5. U.S. Secretary of Energy, Jennifer Granholm

6. FDA’s Principal Deputy Commissioner Janet Woodcock

7. U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Xavier Beuerra

8. U.S. Secretary of Transportation, Pete Buttigieg

9. Secretary of State Antony Blinken

10. Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Maynrkas

11. Secretary of Commerce, Gina M. Raimondo

12. Department of Justice, Attorney General Merrick Garland

13. Commissioner of Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf M.D.

14. Secretary of Labor, Marty Walsh

15. Deputy Secretary of Labor, Julie Su

I intend to keep other patriots completely up to date.

Expand full comment